Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hancox v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 735 Citation: Hancox v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 735
Appeal from: Hancox v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] AATA 836
Parties: ANDREW HANCOX v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: SAD 332 of 2012
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 29 July 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal to Federal Court of Australia pursuant to s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – where appeal on a question of law. TAXATION – Appeal from a review by the Tribunal of a reviewable objection decision made by the respondent pursuant to s 14ZZ(1)(a) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – where respondent amended applicant's assessment of taxable income for the 2009/2010 income year – where applicant's objection was disallowed – where applicant was paid a "living-away-from-home" allowance – whether the allowance fell within the terms of s 30(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (Cth) – whether the allowance was part of the applicant's assessable income pursuant to s 15-2 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 – where applicant incurred expenses for accommodation and food and sustenance – whether expenses were deductible expenses within s 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth). PENALTY – Appeal from Tribunal's review of the respondent's decision to issue a shortfall penalty to the applicant – whether the applicant was reckless – whether the applicant made statements that were false and misleading pursuant to s 284-75 of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). Held: The appeal be dismissed. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate