Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 745 Citation: Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 745
Parties: RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL, PANKAJ OSWAL and PANKAJ OSWAL AS TRUSTEE OF THE BURRUP TRUST v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File numbers: NSD 850 of 2012 NSD 851 of 2012 NSD 852 of 2012
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 31 July 2013
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – Part 3-1 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – capital gains – exercise of special power of appointment by trustee of discretionary trust in respect of part of corpus for absolute benefit of some but not all objects – whether trust created over assets by "declaration" of trust or "settlement" under s 104-55 (CGT event E1) – whether objects became absolutely entitled to assets so appointed as against the trustee under s 104-75 (CGT event E5) – whether disposal of an asset (CGT event A1)
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 104-10, 104-55, 104-75, 108-5, 855-15, 855-20, 995-1 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Pt IVC Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Div 6 Finance Act 1965 (UK) s 25 Stamps Act 1892 (Vic) Part VIII of the Schedule Trustee's Act 1962 (WA) s 28 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 30.01
Cases cited: A & G Lamattina & Sons Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (1996) 96 ATC 4474 cited Burns v Leda Holdings Pty Ltd [1988] 1 Qd R 214 distinguished Buzza v Comptroller of Stamps (Vic) (1951) 83 CLR 286 cited Byrnes v Kendall (2010–11) 243 CLR 253 cited Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW)v Buckle (1998) 192 CLR 226 discussed Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Q) v Hopkins (1945) 71 CLR 351 cited Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) v Livingston [1965] AC 694 cited Commissioner of State Revenue v Lam & Kym Pty Ltd (2004) 10 VR 420 approved/followed Davidson v Armytage (1906) 4 CLR 204 cited DKLR Holding Co (No 2) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1981-82) 149 CLR 431 discussed Foakes v Jackson [1900] 1 Ch 807 cited Herdegen v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 84 ALR 27 cited In re Hancock [1896] 2 Ch 173 cited Inland Revenue Commissioner v Cookson [1977] 2 All ER 331 cited Kafataris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 172 FCR 242 followed Kemtron Industries Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1984] 1 Qd R 576 distinguished Kent v SS "Maria Luisa" (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 12 cited Massereene v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1900] 2 Ir R 138 cited Oswal v Yara Australia Pty Ltd [No 3] [2011] WASC 255 not followed Roome v Edwards [1982] AC 279 distinguished Stephenson v Barclays Bank Trust Company Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 882 cited Thomson v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 80 CLR 344 cited Underhill and Hayton: Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (18th ed, LexisNexis, 2010)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate