Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council [2013] FCA 765 Citation: Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council [2013] FCA 765
Parties: MILOVAN STANKOVIC v THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL, WATSON AND WATSON (A FIRM), TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE, JASON SHANE CRONAN, CHARLES HOCKEY and KENT LAWYERS (A FIRM)
File number: NSD 1283 of 2013
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 5 August 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from summary dismissal of proceeding in which applicant sought annulment of bankruptcy and other relief – whether decision attended with sufficient doubt to warrant it being reconsidered by a Full Court – consideration of further applications seeking pro bono legal assistance, trial by jury, injunctions and stays of orders
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 30(5)(b), 37(2)(a), 52(3), 116, 153B, 156A(3)(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A), 24(1D), 31A, 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.12, 4.13, 16.21, 26.01
Cases cited: Atieh v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2013] FCA 20 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd and Another v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Kent and Orlizki, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Milovan Stankovic [2012] FCA 333 Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council [2013] FCA 652 Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council (No 3) [2012] FCA 523 Stankovic v Van Der Velde [2012] FCA 1436 The State of New South Wales v Canellis and Others (1994) 181 CLR 309
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate