Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maytom v Prentice [2013] FCA 766 Citation: Maytom v Prentice [2013] FCA 766
Appeal from: Maytom v Warren McKeon Dickson Solicitors & ors [2013] FCCA 1009
Parties: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM v MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
File number: NSD 1490 of 2013
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 25 July 2013
Cases cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 applied Maytom v Prentice (No 2) [2103] FCA 502 referred Maytom v Prentice [2013] FCA 387 referred to Maytom v Warren McKeon Dickson Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1300 referred to
Date of hearing: 25 July 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person with Ms R Taylor as litigant guardian
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms S Nash of Sally Nash & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1490 of 2013
BETWEEN: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM
Applicant
AND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 25 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The respondent trustee's costs of the application for leave to appeal be costs in the administration of the estate. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1490 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate