Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 5) [2013] FCA 793 Citation: Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 5) [2013] FCA 793
Parties: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION SOUTHGATE INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: NSD 653 of 2011, NSD 652 of 2011, NSD 654 of 2011, NSD 655 of 2011, NSD 656 of 2011
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 August 2013
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Application for discrete evidentiary hearing – Whether balance of convenience favours discrete hearing EVIDENCE – Application for determination of admissibility of documents by a judge other than the docket Judge – Whether appropriate in the circumstances
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 136, 138
Date of hearing: 8 August 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms R L Seiden, Mr J Hyde Page
Solicitor for the Applicant: Henry Davis York
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D J Fagan SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 652 of 2011
BETWEEN: BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate