Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 1) [2013] FCA 798 Citation: Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 1) [2013] FCA 798
Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal from: Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 407
Parties: VIVIENNE LOUISE DYE v COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES LIMITED (ACN 067 254 399), SIR RALPH NORRIS, MICHAEL BLOMFIELD, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 123 123 124) and BARBARA CHAPMAN
File number: NSD 1548 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 9 August 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application for leave to appeal from Federal Court of Australia
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 34.24
Cases cited: Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited [2012] FCA 242 cited Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited [2012] FCA 992 cited Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 407 cited
Date of hearing: 9 August 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Richardson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Herbert Smith Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1548 of 2013
BETWEEN: VIVIENNE LOUISE DYE
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES LIMITED (ACN 067 254 399)
First Respondent
SIR RALPH NORRIS
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate