Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Specsavers Pty Limited v Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 807 Citation: Specsavers Pty Limited v Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 807
Parties: SPECSAVERS PTY LTD v LUXOTTICA RETAIL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
File number: NSD 446 of 2013
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – "Calderbank" offers made – whether indemnity costs should be awarded – indicative factors relevant to award of indemnity costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011
Cases cited: Alpine Hardwoods (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) (2002) 190 ALR 121 Black v Lipovac (1998) 217 ALR 386 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435 Maclean v Rottnest Island Authority [2001] WASCA 323 MGICA (1992) Pty Ltd v Kenny & Good Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 70 FCR 236 Specsavers Pty Ltd v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd (2012) 208 FCR 78 Specsavers Pty Ltd v Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 648
Date of hearing: Matter determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 31 July 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr DB Studdy SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Hall
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate