Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Francis v Eggleston Mitchell Lawyers Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 836 Citation: Francis v Eggleston Mitchell Lawyers Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 836
Appeal from: Francis v Eggleston Mitchell Lawyers Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 564
Parties: LOUISE FRANCIS v EGGLESTON MITCHELL LAWYERS PTY LTD (ACN 131 952 942), GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LOUISE FRANCIS) and ANDREW REGINALD YEO (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LOUISE FRANCIS)
File number: VID 695 of 2013
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2013
Date of hearing: 19 July 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: J A Ribbands with L P Wirth
Solicitor for the Appellant: John Finlayson Lawyers
Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents: P F Agardy
Solicitor for the Second and Third Respondents: Mendelsons Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 695 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: LOUISE FRANCIS
Appellant
AND: EGGLESTON MITCHELL LAWYERS PTY LTD (ACN 131 952 942)
First Respondent
GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LOUISE FRANCIS)
Second Respondent
ANDREW REGINALD YEO (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LOUISE FRANCIS)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate