Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Thompson v Kane [2013] FCA 862 Citation: Thompson v Kane [2013] FCA 862
Parties: PETER JAMES THOMPSON v TERESA KANE, JUDGE SPELLEKEN OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA and THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number(s): QUD 206 of 2012
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an urgent interlocutory application seeking an injunction in the exercise of the Federal Court's jurisdiction under the s 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 94AAA(1)(a) Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth), r 1.14, r 22.03, r 22.11(3) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1)
Cases cited: Thompson v Kane (No. 2) [2012] FCA 763 - cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 - cited Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 - cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 – cited
Date of hearing: 23 August 2013
Date of last submissions: 23 August 2013
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 35
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor, Mr M Hanson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 206 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate