Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Panasia Aluminium (China) Limited v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2013] FCA 870 Citation: Panasia Aluminium (China) Limited v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2013] FCA 870
Parties: PANASIA ALUMINIUM (CHINA) LIMITED and OPAL (MACAO COMMERCIAL OFFSHORE) LIMITED v ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH and CAPRAL LIMITED (INTERVENER)
File number: NSD 1653 of 2011
Parties: TAI SHAN CITY KAM KIU ALUMINIUM EXTRUSION CO LIMITED and KAM KIU ALUMINIUM PRODUCTS SDN BHD and KAM KIU (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED v ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH and TRADE MEASURES REVIEW OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AUSTRALIAN CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SERVICE and CAPRAL LIMITED (INTERVENER)
File number: NSD 1869 of 2011
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 30 August 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Part XVB Customs Act 1901 (Cth) (Act) – anti-dumping measures – countervailable subsidy – aluminium extrusions exported from China to Australia by State-owned suppliers – whether supplier "public body" within the meaning of that term as used in definition of "subsidy" – consideration of Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement) – whether decision-maker misinterpreted or misapplied definition of "public body" as used in Act – whether decision-maker misinterpreted or misapplied World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body jurisprudence on meaning of "public body" in SCM Agreement. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Part XVB of Act – anti-dumping measures – where goods under consideration (GUC) consist of range of aluminium extrusions having different finishes – where decision-maker makes declarations pursuant to subss 269TG(1) and (2) and subss 269TJ(1) and (2) in respect of GUC – whether open to decision-maker to specify different variable factors in respect of different types of GUC pursuant to subs 269TG(3) and subs 269TJ(11) – consideration of statutory scheme in relation to determination of dumping margins – applicability of subs 33(3A) of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) to ss 269TG and 269TJ – imposition of anti-dumping measures on consolidated or differentiated basis – whether imposition on differentiated basis permissible – relevance of WTO agreements – General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 – Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 – consideration of WTO Appellate Body jurisprudence on "zeroing". ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Part XVB of Act – public notices published pursuant to subss 269ZZI(2) and 269ZZL(2)(b) – consequences of non-compliance with subss 269ZZI(2) or 269ZZL(2)(b) – whether any review by TMRO or reinvestigation by CEO or subsequent decision by Minister under s 269ZZM liable to be set aside due to such non-compliance – whether non-compliance gave rise to denial of procedural fairness. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Part XVB of Act – words and phrases – normal value – export price – non-injurious price – dumping margin – like goods – competitive market costs – for less than adequate remuneration.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate