Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deas v Issa [2013] FCA 892 Citation: Deas v Issa [2013] FCA 892
Appeal from: Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2013] AATA 292
Parties: SARAH DEAS, JOHN FORSYTH and ROBERT WOOD v BRYON ISSA, PAUL KRASSARIS and AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY PHARMACY AUTHORITY
File number: VID 456 of 2013
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 4 September 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal under s 44 of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether Tribunal erred in law in holding that first respondent had "legal right to occupy premises" within the meaning of Sch 2 of National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2011
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 90, 99K, 99L National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2011
Cases cited: United Dominions Corporation Ltd v Brian Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1
Date of hearing: 16 August 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Pizer
Solicitor for the Applicants: Meridian Lawyers
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr D Favell
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate