Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Attachmate Corporation v Commonwealth of Australia (No 1) [2013] FCA 896 Citation: Attachmate Corporation v Commonwealth of Australia (No 1) [2013] FCA 896
Parties: ATTACHMATE CORPORATION v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 1774 of 2011
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 3 September 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – Application for discovery prior to the serving of evidence
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 138
Cases cited: Foley v Gunns Ltd [2012] FCA 595 cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S M Anderson SC, Mr P Wallis
Solicitor for the Applicant: Griffith Hack Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M J Colbran QC, Mr T Cordiner
Solicitor for the Respondent: DLA Piper
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1774 of 2011
BETWEEN: ATTACHMATE CORPORATION
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant give discovery in accordance with the amended discovery category 2.5. 2. Respondent's costs in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1774 of 2011
BETWEEN: ATTACHMATE CORPORATION
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate