Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shomali v Ecolour Pty Limited [2013] FCA 899 Citation: Shomali v Ecolour Pty Limited [2013] FCA 899
Parties: BASSAM SHOMALI and ANNE SHOMALI v ECOLOUR PTY LIMITED ACN 137498438, CHIMES MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED ACN 099061382, STUART MCPHEE and BELLE MCPHEE
File number: NSD 2213 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2013
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – sale of business – licensing agreement – representations about sales and future potential – confidential information
Legislation: Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
Cases cited: Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658; [1982] HCA 70 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Cunningham's Warehouse Sales Pty Ltd (2012) 246 CLR 498; [2012] HCA 7 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (2003) 196 ALR 257; [2003] HCA 10 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315
Date of hearing: 22 - 24 July 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 183
Counsel for the Applicants: J E Rawlings
Solicitor for the Applicants: Family Law Solutions
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2213 of 2011
BETWEEN: BASSAM SHOMALI
First Applicant
ANNE SHOMALI
Second Applicant
AND: ECOLOUR PTY LIMITED ACN 137498438
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate