Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Winra v Skycity Adelaide Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 910 Citation: Winra v Skycity Adelaide Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 910
Parties: BETHANY HELENA WINRA v SKYCITY ADELAIDE PTY LTD and DAVID KELMAN
File number: SAD 285 of 2011
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 10 September 2013
Legislation: Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) s 106(2)
Dates of hearing: 4, 6 September 2013
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Heywood-Smith QC and Mr S Mitchell
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hamdan Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms K Eastman SC and Mr A Manos (on 4 September 2013) Ms K Eastman SC (on 6 September 2013)
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 285 of 2011
BETWEEN: BETHANY HELENA WINRA
Applicant
AND: SKYCITY ADELAIDE PTY LTD
First Respondent
DAVID KELMAN
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BESANKO J DATE OF ORDER: 6 september 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The trial date of Monday 9 September 2013 be vacated. 2. The first respondent's application for the costs of the vacation of the trial date against the applicant's solicitors on an indemnity basis is adjourned to a date to be fixed. 3. The applicant has leave to file an Amended Reply in terms of the document received in the Registry on 2 September 2013 minus paragraph 1A and the amendment to paragraph 2b. 4. The time within which the applicant is to file and serve any affidavits containing her evidence in chief is extended to Friday 4 October 2013. 5. The time within which the first respondent is to file and serve any affidavits containing its evidence in chief is extended to Friday 1 November 2013. 6. The directions hearing be adjourned to Tuesday 5 November 2013 at 9.30am. 7. Liberty to apply. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate