Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hockey v WIN Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 921 Citation: Hockey v WIN Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 921
Parties: RODNEY HOCKEY v WIN CORPORATION PTY LTD ACN 000 737 404
File number: NSD 994 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 11 September 2013
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – contract of employment – sum for which judgment should be entered – gross sum under current tax rates to give agreed net sum INTEREST – sum on which pre-judgment interest under s 51A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) should be calculated where, at time of non-payment, amount required to be withheld by employer from employment termination payment under Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) COSTS – where offer under Pt 25 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – offer made by applicant not accepted by respondent – applicant obtained judgment more favourable than the terms of the offer – whether presumptive rule should be displaced or modified where part of applicant's case failed and some of his evidence rejected for irrelevance – whether part which failed relevantly separate or added substantially to length of hearing
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 25.14
Cases cited: Hockey v WIN Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 772 Hodgson v Amcor Limited [2012] VSC 205 Patterson v Middle Harbour Yacht Club (1996) 64 FCR 405
Date of hearing: 11 September 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate