Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pennicott Wilderness Journeys Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Cruises and Charters Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] FCA 932 Citation: Pennicott Wilderness Journeys Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Cruises and Charters Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] FCA 932
Parties: PENNICOTT WILDERNESS JOURNEYS PTY LTD (ACN 114 449 348) v TASMANIAN CRUISES AND CHARTERS PTY LTD (ACN 139 176 257) (in liquidation)
File number: TAD 17 of 2012
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2013
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – whether persons in the former business of the respondent breached orders of the Court made by consent – whether charges of contempt proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 41.06, 41.08
Cases cited: Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd (2006) 149 FCR 494 Pennicott Wilderness Journeys Pty Ltd v Bruny Island Adventure Cruises Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] FCA 282
Dates of hearing: 6 and 7 August 2013
Date of last submissions: 11 September 2013
Place: Hobart
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Rinaldi with Mr P Griffits
Solicitor for the Applicant: Griffits & Griffits
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D Geason with Ms P Sutherland
Solicitor for the Respondent: Butler McIntyre & Butler
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION TAD 17 of 2012
BETWEEN: PENNICOTT WILDERNESS JOURNEYS PTY LTD (ACN 114 449 348)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate