Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Abbott (No 6) [2013] FCA 942 Citation: Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Abbott (No 6) [2013] FCA 942
Parties: DIRECTOR, FAIR WORK BUILDING INDUSTRY INSPECTORATE v BENJAMIN ABBOTT AND OTHERS
File number: WAD 230 of 2008
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 18 September 2013
Corrigendum: 21 November 2013
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – penalties – contravention of s 38 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) (the BCII Act), ss 494, 496(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) (the WR Act) and breaches of the relevant provisions of the Union Collective Agreements – general penalty principles – relevant considerations – the nature and extent of the relevant conduct – whether the contravening conduct was deliberate or part of a conscious act on the part of the contravener – whether there was evidence of contrition – specific deterrence – general deterrence – whether there were any mitigating factors – quantum of penalty – totality – whether the penalties should be suspended COSTS – industrial proceedings – prohibition on awarding costs – proceedings based in part on a matter arising under the WR Act and in part on a matter arising under another Commonwealth Act
Legislation: Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 494, 496(1), 719(1), (4), 824 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 418, 570 Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) ss 4, 38, 49(2), 75(7) Building and Construction Industry Improvement Bill 2005 (Cth) Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(1) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate