Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Union of Workers v Qantas Airways Ltd [2013] FCA 976 Citation: National Union of Workers v Qantas Airways Ltd [2013] FCA 976
Parties: NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS v QANTAS AIRWAYS LTD (ACN 009 661 901)
File number: NSD 1828 of 2012
Judge: COWDROY J
Date of judgment: 27 September 2013
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – employees of respondent company formerly engaged under an enterprise bargaining agreement re-engaged under a new workplace determination as a result of a company restructure – applicant union alleging that such employees are more properly covered by the enterprise bargaining agreement – scope of industrial instruments – whether the enterprise bargaining agreement or the workplace determination prevails – employees duties following restructure characterised as more properly the subject of the workplace determination
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 3, 21, 52, 54, 55, 224, 227, 266, 267, 277, 278
Cases cited: Amcor v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2005) 222 CLR 241 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99 Carpenter v Corona Manufacturing Pty Ltd (2002) 122 IR 387 Kingmill Australia Pty Ltd t/a Thrifty Car Rental v Federated Clerks' Union of Australia (NSW Branch) (2001) 106 IR 217 J Fenwick & Company Pty Ltd v Merchant Service Guild of Australia (1973) 150 CAR 99 Kanes Hire Pty Ltd v Mitchell (2010) 203 IR 37 Kucks v CSR Limited (1996) 66 IR 182 TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Hayden Enterprises Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 130 Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited [2012] FWAFB 6612
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate