Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stathopoulos v Junkeer [2013] FCA 985 Citation: Stathopoulos v Junkeer [2013] FCA 985
Appeal from: Stathopoulos v Junkeer & Anor [2012] FMCA 618
Parties: GEORGE STATHOPOULOS v DEBORAH LILITHE JUNKEER
File number: VID 486 of 2012
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2013
Date of hearing: 26 August 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondent: G J Herbert
Solicitor for the Respondent: Kiatos & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 486 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: GEORGE STATHOPOULOS
Appellant
AND: DEBORAH LILITHE JUNKEER
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 26 AUGUST 2013 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondent be relieved from compliance with the rules otherwise requiring service on the appellant of an application to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 2. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 486 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: GEORGE STATHOPOULOS
Appellant
AND: DEBORAH LILITHE JUNKEER
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE: 26 AUGUST 2013 PLACE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate