Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Environment v Rothenberger Australia Pty Limited [2013] FCA 1023 Citation: Minister for Environment v Rothenberger Australia Pty Limited [2013] FCA 1023
Parties: MINISTER FOR ENVIRONMENT v ROTHENBERGER AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ABN 12 008 411 568)
File number: NSD 1191 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 October 2013
Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT LAW – Declaration of contravention sought –Failure to provide quarterly reports to Minister - Statement of agreed facts supplied by the parties EVIDENCE – Declarations – Statement of agreed facts adduced as evidence – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 – Whether agreed facts sufficient to support declarations
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Ozone Protection and Synthetic Gas Management Act 1989 (Cth) ss 13, 16, 46A Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations 1995 (Cth) reg 901
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 378 cited Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Solicitor for the Applicant: Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
Solicitor for the Respondent: Piper Alderman
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1191 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate