Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sharley v Repatriation Commission [2013] FCA 1031 Citation: Sharley v Repatriation Commission [2013] FCA 1031
Appeal from: Administrative Appeals Tribunal: [2010] AATA 474
Parties: JOHN DOUGLAS SHARLEY v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
File number: VID 635 of 2010
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 14 October 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal under s 44 of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – Tribunal affirmed decision of respondent that applicant did not suffer from war-caused post-traumatic stress disorder and remitted to respondent question whether applicant suffered from war-caused osteoarthritis – whether Tribunal erred by not addressing whether material before it was sufficient to justify conclusion or by failing to apply relevant Statement of Principles correctly – whether Tribunal erred by not providing adequate reasons for its conclusion that applicant did not suffer war-caused post-traumatic stress disorder – whether Tribunal erred by not providing written reasons for part of applicant's claim relating to osteoarthritis after respondent's affirmation of decision remitted by Tribunal under s 42D of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), ss 42D, 43, 44 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Veterans' Entitlement Act 1986 (Cth), ss 7, 9, 13, 120, 120A, 196B
Cases cited: Hill v Repatriation Commission (2004) 207 ALR 470 Repatriation Commission v Bawden (2012) 206 FCR 296 Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 Repatriation Commission v Hendy (2002) 76 ALD 47 Smith v Repatriation Commission (2012) 131 ALD 63
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate