Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 3) [2013] FCA 1033 Citation: Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 3) [2013] FCA 1033
Parties: INVESTA PROPERTIES PTY LTD (ACN 084 407 241) and INVESTA RESIDENTIAL GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 098 527 390) v ASHLEY COLIN NANKERVIS, ADAM KIMBERLY BARCLAY and OLIVER HUME SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND PTY LTD (ACN 128 863 230)
File number: QUD 231 of 2011
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend originating application and statement of claim pursuant to r 16.53 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – several previous attempts to amend statement of claim – whether material facts pleaded to support allegations REMEDIES – reflective loss rule
Legislation: Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 (Qld) s 134 Property Agents and Motor Dealers (Real Estate Agency Practice Code of Conduct) Regulation 2001 (Qld) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.53
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 cited Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 cited Gould and Birbeck and Bacon v Mount Oxide Mines Ltd (In liq) (1916) 22 CLR 490 cited Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 2) [2013] FCA 468 cited Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1 cited Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd [1996] 1 AC 514 cited Thomas v D'Arcy [2005] 1 Qd R 666 cited Warman International Ltd v Dwyer (1995) 182 CLR 544 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate