Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coshott v Prentice [2013] FCA 1036 Citation: Coshott v Prentice [2013] FCA 1036
Parties: LJILJANA COSHOTT and SCHLOTZKY'S NOMINEE COMPANY PTY LIMITED v MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT and JAMES COSHOTT
File number: NSD 2016 of 2013
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 4 October 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a stay pending hearing of appeal – application of relevant principles – whether notice of appeal discloses a reasonably arguable point
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 30 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 66G Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 29 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dubow v Fitness First (Australia) Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 660 George v Fletcher Lewis v Condon [2013] NSWCA 204 Ozden v Ozden [2013] VSCA 195 Park v Barclay (2010) 239 FLR 396 Raftland v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 238 CLR 516 Sharrment Pty Limited v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 Starr-Diamond v Diamond (No. 3) [2013] NSWSC 351
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate