Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Findlay v Next Financial Limited [2013] FCA 1038 Citation: Findlay v Next Financial Limited [2013] FCA 1038
Parties: SUZANNE MARY FINDLAY AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED) v NEXT FINANCIAL LIMITED ACN 081 722 894 KATHERINE BELL AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED) v NEXT FINANCIAL LIMITED ACN 081 722 894
File numbers: WAD 413 of 2011 WAD 104 of 2012
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 14 August 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to redact certain information in discovered documents – whether redaction appropriate in the circumstances
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 9 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 20.14(1)(a)
Date of hearing: 14 August 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms T Hong
Solicitor for the Applicants: Solomon Brothers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Finch SC and Mr R Foreman
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 413 of 2011
BETWEEN: SUZANNE MARY FINDLAY AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED)
Applicants
AND: NEXT FINANCIAL LIMITED ACN 081 722 894
Respondent
NEXT FINANCIAL LIMITED ACN 081 722 894
Cross Claimant
AUDAX LEGAL PTY LTD ACN 102 860 435
Cross Respondent
NEXT FINANCIAL LIMITED ACN 081 722 894
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate