Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] FCA 1045 Citation: Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] FCA 1045
Parties: ALLIANCE CRATON EXPLORER PTY LTD ACN 095 337 385 v QUASAR RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 101 227 070 and HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 011 018 232
File number: VID 551 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – documents relating to the capacity of an applicant seeking equitable relief – limited order for discovery made
Cases cited: Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 1044 discussed
Date of hearing: 23 September 2013
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: B Roberts
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth
Counsel for the First Respondent: M Hoffmann QC
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Second Respondent: R Higgins
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 551 of 2010
BETWEEN: ALLIANCE CRATON EXPLORER PTY LTD ACN 095 337 385
Applicant
AND: QUASAR RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 101 227 070
First Respondent
HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 011 018 232
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 16 OCTOBER 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate