Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2013] FCA 1065 Citation: Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2013] FCA 1065
Parties: DR ANGELO SKLAVOS v THE AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF DERMATOLOGISTS, DR WARREN WEIGHTMAN, DR ROBERT SINCLAIR, DR CATHERINE REID, DR CARL VINCIULLO, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR CHRIS BAKER, DR DAVID FRANCIS, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DOUGLAS GIN, DR JENNIFER MENZ, DR DAVID COOK, DR PHILLIP ARTEMI, DR JEREMY HORTON, DR CLARE TAIT and DR ALAN DONNELLY
File number: NSD 992 of 2013
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 23 October 2013
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – disability discrimination – application to strike out claims against multiple respondents – whether applicant can proceed against members of Board – whether AHRC Act permits complaint against continuing behaviour – utility
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011
Cases cited: Charles v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 105 FCR 573; [2000] FCA 1531 Commonwealth v Sex Discrimination Commissioner (1998) 90 FCR 179; [1998] FCA 1607 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 Haraksin v Murrays Australia Ltd (No 2) (2013) 211 FCR 1; [2013] FCA 217 Rana v Commonwealth of Australia [2013] FCA 189 Robinson v Commissioner of Police (NSW Police Force) [2013] FCAFC 64 Robinson v NSW Police Service [2011] FCA 1081 Simplot Australia Pty Ltd v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1996) 69 FCR 90 Travers v State of New South Wales [2000] FCA 1565 Wu v University of Western Sydney [2011] FCA 1143
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate