Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Moody Kiddell & Partners Pty Ltd v Arkell [2013] FCA 1066 Citation: Moody Kiddell & Partners Pty Ltd v Arkell [2013] FCA 1066
Parties: MOODY KIDDELL & PARTNERS PTY LTD v BENJAMIN JOHN ARKELL, DAVID ANDREW BROOKE and BROOLEND PTY LTD (ACN 125 742 225) T/A BROOKE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS
File number(s): NSD 2323 of 2011
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2013
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – application to strike out defence – deletion of emails – destruction of evidence
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011
Cases cited: Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2000] EWCA Civ 200 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524; [2002] VSCA 197 Clark v State of New South Wales (2006) 66 NSWLR 640; [2006] NSWSC 673 Clark v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 139 Palavi v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 264
Date of hearing: 25 September 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Applicant: A Moses SC with M P Cleary
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: M Condon SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Thurlow Fisher Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2323 of 2011
BETWEEN: MOODY KIDDELL & PARTNERS PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: BENJAMIN JOHN ARKELL
First Respondent
DAVID ANDREW BROOKE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate