Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Wu [2013] FCA 1067 Citation: Li v Wu [2013] FCA 1067
Parties: YU XIN LI v TAO WU
File number: ACD 54 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2013
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – misleading and deceptive conduct – breach of express and implied terms – equitable compensation – construction of contract – indemnity provisions – member loans
Legislation: Fair Trading Act 1992 (ACT)
Cases cited: Antaios Companios Naviera SA v Salem-Rederiesna AB [1985] AC 191 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99 Ballard v Multiplex Ltd (2008) 68 ACSR 208; [2008] NSWSC 1019 Commissioner of Taxation v Radilo Enterprises Pty Ltd (1997) 72 FCR 300 Commissioner of Taxation v Rawson Finances Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 753 Commissioner of Taxation v Firth (2002) 120 FCR 450 Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461; (1843) 67 ER 189 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 210 CLR 181 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451; [2004] HCA 35 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (2003) 196 ALR 257; [2003] HCA 10 Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2) [1982] Ch 204 Steggles Ltd v Yarrabee Chicken Company Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 91 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate