Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Warner v Hung, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) (No 2) [2013] FCA 1071 Citation: Warner v Hung, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) (No 2) [2013] FCA 1071
Parties: ANTHONY JOHN WARNER AND STEVEN KUGEL IN THEIR CAPACITY AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF BELLPAC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 713 017 and BELLPAC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 713 017 v KEN YUK KEE HUNG, AUSTCORP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) ACN 003 132 090, ALFRED WONG, DANNY AU-YEUNG, SHAN PEI INVESTMENT LIMITED, GOOD TEAM INVESTMENTS LIMITED, GREAT INVESTMENTS LIMITED, OSMOND TZE LEUNG KWOK, HONG XU, ZHI HONG, CHIAH CHEANG LEE, GUJARAT NRE COKING COAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GUJARAT NRE MINERALS LIMITED), ALL SEASONS RESOURCES INC and VIEW PLAN RESOURCES LIMITED
File number: NSD 1063 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 5 November 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application for security for costs dismissed – whether defendants to interlocutory application should pay the costs of the plaintiffs PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether oral application for an adjournment should be granted
Legislation cited: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 19.05
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate