Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fulton v Northern Territory of Australia [2013] FCA 1088 Citation: Fulton v Northern Territory of Australia [2013] FCA 1088
Parties: VINCE FULTON ON BEHALF OF THE GUYAL AMBULYA, GUYAL MUYNMIN, BUDAL LABANGA, MURRUNGUN BALAGANDA, MAMBALIYA NGUBAYIN AND MAMBALIYA WUNGURRINDJIRR GROUPS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA AND THAMES PASTORAL COMPANY PTY LIMITED
File number: NTD 33 of 2012
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2013
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – Consent Determination – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) - agreement of parties
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 55, 56, 57, 66, 67, 87, 94A, 223, 225, 251D Native Title Amendment Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 Smith v State of Western Australia (2000) 104 FCR 494 King v Northern Territory of Australia (2007) 162 FCR 89
Date of hearing: 31 October 2013
Place: Minyerri
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate