Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 13) [2013] FCA 1095 Citation: Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 13) [2013] FCA 1095
Parties: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION SOUTHGATE INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v HUA WANG BANK BERHAD DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED, DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED, BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
File numbers: NSD 653 of 2011 NSD 652 of 2011 NSD 654 of 2011 NSD 655 of 2011 NSD 656 of 2011 VID 672 of 2010 VID 887 of 2010
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2013
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Application for suppression order – Whether order necessary for the proper administration of justice
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AG, 37AI, 37AJ
Cases cited: Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 12) [2013] FCA 1091 cited Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096 cited
Date of hearing: 16, 17 October 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate