Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Ltd v Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, David Bradbury MP [2013] FCA 1103 Citation: Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Ltd v Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, David Bradbury MP [2013] FCA 1103
Appeal from: Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Ltd v Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, David Bradbury MP [2013] FCCA 188
Parties: PRO TEETH WHITENING (AUST) PTY LTD v PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY TO THE TREASURER, DAVID BRADBURY MP
File number: QUD 242 of 2013
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs – costs – reasonably arguable ground of appeal
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 132J(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.09
Cases cited: Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited [2012] FCA 992 cited
Date of hearing: 9 October 2013
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G Del Villar
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 242 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: PRO TEETH WHITENING (AUST) PTY LTD
Appellant
AND: PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY TO THE TREASURER, DAVID BRADBURY MP
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate