Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Boobera Lagoon Technology LLC v Zomojo Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1107 Citation: Boobera Lagoon Technology LLC v Zomojo Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1107
Parties: BOOBERA LAGOON TECHNOLOGY LLC v ZOMOJO PTY LTD (ACN 114 604 269)
File number: VID 1066 of 2013
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 18 October 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction restraining respondents from using or disclosing information contained in various documents where respondents entitled to access and use documents pursuant to orders of the court in another proceeding – whether applicant has established arguable case that information covered by equitable doctrine of confidence – whether balance of convenience favours granting of interlocutory restraint
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Corrs Pavey Whiting and Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 Zomojo Pty Ltd v Hurd (No 2) (2012) 299 ALR 621
Date of hearing: 11 and 18 October 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 31
Counsel for the Applicant: R Cobden SC with A Maryniak and W Rothnie
Solicitor for the Applicant: Baker & McKenzie
Counsel for the Respondent: Dr M Collins SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1066 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate