Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Doherty v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2013] FCA 1122 Citation: Doherty v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2013] FCA 1122
Appeal from: Doherty and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2012] AATA 635
Parties: PETER JOHN DOHERTY v INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1611 of 2012
Judge: COWDROY J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal misconceived evidence before it – whether the alleged misconception amounted to an error of law – whether the decision of the Tribunal is tainted with Wednesbury unreasonableness – whether the decision was illogical – whether the applicant was afforded procedural fairness – whether adequate reasons were provided for the decision
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 185C, 185E, 186Q Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth)
Cases cited: Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Gantidis (1979) 140 CLR 675 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority (2008) 235 CLR 286 Teuila v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 59 AAR 98 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate