Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ludowyk v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2013] FCA 1153 Citation: Ludowyk v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2013] FCA 1153
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Ludowyk v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2013] FCA 692
Parties: PATRICIA ANNE LUDOWYK v SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL
File number: ACD 84 of 2013
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 1 November 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time to appeal – application of relevant principles – whether sufficient merit in proposed grounds of appeal
Legislation: Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 12, 22, 37, 46 Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth) ss 137, 157 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36
Cases cited: Budd v the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 345 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Limited v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Mentink v The Minister for Home Affairs [2013] FCAFC 113 Phillips v Australian Girls' Choir Pty Limited [2001] FMCA 109 Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd v Crocker (2001) 48 ATR 359
Date of hearing: 1 November 2013
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Anforth
Solicitor for the Applicant: Lander & Co, Solicitors
Respondent: The respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 84 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate