Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communications and Media Authority [2013] FCA 1157 Citation: Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communications and Media Authority [2013] FCA 1157
Parties: TODAY FM (SYDNEY) PTY LTD v AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA AUTHORITY
File number: NSD 1063 of 2013
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 7 November 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – powers of Australian Communications and Media Authority ("ACMA") to regulate commercial radio broadcasting licence holders – preliminary investigation report concludes that applicant contravened Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) and therefore breached a condition of licence under Schedule 2 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) – whether ACMA can so conclude before competent Court adjudicates the issue – ACMA's role to regulate the conduct of licensees including conducting investigations – whether ACMA's findings interfere with the administration of justice in a criminal proceeding where no criminal proceeding has commenced – ACMA's finding not determinative on question of criminal guilt. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – whether ACMA's conclusion of breach of licence condition involves exercise of judicial power in conflict with Ch III of the Constitution
Legislation: Constitution Chs II, III Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005 (Cth) ss 6, 10, 12 Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5, 42, Pt 10 Div 3, Pt 11 Div 1, s 150, Pt 13 Div 2 ss 199, 204, 205L, 205N, Sch 2 – Pt 4, cl 8 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 140, 141 Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) ss 7, 11 Commercial Radio Australia Codes of Practice and Guidelines 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate