Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Catalano v Managing Australian Destinations Pty Limited (No 3) [2013] FCA 1194 Citation: Catalano v Managing Australian Destinations Pty Limited (No 3) [2013] FCA 1194
Parties: NATHAN CATALANO, MAUREEN & NATHAN CATALANO AS TRUSTEES OF THE EQUICAP PTY LIMITED PROVIDENT FUND (ABN 70 739 750 546) and FINE FOOD SOLUTIONZ PTY LTD (ABN 83 134 923 005) v MANAGING AUSTRALIAN DESTINATIONS PTY LIMITED, BYRON KURTH, JUY HEPNER, THE GOURMET DIM SIM COMPANY PTY LIMITED and BEN LYDEN; JUY HEPNER and KURTH MANAGEMENT PTY LTD (ACN 102 842 580); FINE FOOD SOLUTIONZ PTY LTD (ACN 134 923 005), NATHAN CATALANO, INNOVA FOODS PTY LTD (ACN 154 548 375), SAM CATALANO and SAM, MAUREEN & NATHAN CATALANO
File number: NSD 715 of 2012
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 13 November 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – power of Court to make a garnishee order GARNISHEE ORDERS – need for debt which is due or accruing – garnishee order as against trust monies refused
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 41.10 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 117 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Cases cited: Catalano v Managing Australia Destinations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 672 Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 150 CLR 1 Coshott v Learoyd [2001] FCA 88 Howell v Metropolitan District Railway Company (1881) 19 Ch D 508 ML Ubase Holdings Co Ltd v Trigem Computer Inc [2007] NSWSC 859, 69 NSWLR 577 Rogers v Whiteley [1892] AC 118 Vernon v Perry [1962] VR 223 Watson v Morrow (1880) 6 VLR (L) 134
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate