Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1220 Citation: Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1220
Parties: LIFT SHOP PTY LTD (ACN 109 724 647) v EASY LIVING HOME ELEVATORS PTY LTD (ACN 083 936 896)
File number(s): NSD 1875 of 2012
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 20 November 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – whether rejection of offers was unreasonable
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, ss 18, 29 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 25.01, 25.14, 25.14(2)
Cases cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 900 Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 481
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 15 November 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D G Eliades
Solicitor for the Applicant: Giles, Payne & Co
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D B Studdy SC and Ms J M Beaumont
Solicitor for the Respondent: Lander & Rogers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1875 of 2012
BETWEEN: LIFT SHOP PTY LTD (ACN 109 724 647)
Applicant
AND: EASY LIVING HOME ELEVATORS PTY LTD (ACN 083 936 896)
Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 20 november 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate