Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods (No 6) [2013] FCA 1233 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods (No 6) [2013] FCA 1233
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v TURI FOODS PTY LTD (ACN 057 142 971), BAIADA POULTRY PTY LTD (ACN 002 925 948), BARTTER ENTERPRISES PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 451 374) and AUSTRALIAN CHICKEN MEAT FEDERATION INC (ABN 24 077 883 026)
File number: VID 974 of 2011
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 22 November 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – apportionment of costs – discussion of principles governing award of costs
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law s 33 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Pt 25 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53, 55
Cases cited: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 277 – considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods (No 5) [2013] FCA 1109 – cited Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Razzi (No 2) (1991) 30 FCR 64 – considered Dias Aluminium Products Pty Ltd v Ullrick Aluminium Pty Ltd (No 2) (2005) 225 ALR 569 – cited Dodds Family Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Industries Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 261 – considered Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No 4) (2010) 269 ALR 606 – considered Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) (1979) 28 ALR 201 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate