Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kancheff v Charles Darwin University [2013] FCA 1252 Citation: Kancheff v Charles Darwin University [2013] FCA 1252 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Kancheff v Charles Darwin University & Ors [2013] FCCA 1564 Parties: GAVIN MICHAEL KANCHEFF v CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY, GRAHAM PEGG and DAN BASCHIERA
File number: SAD 308 of 2013
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 25 November 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application by applicant for leave to appeal – where Federal Circuit Court Judge made an order that the applicant pay security of costs – whether, in all the circumstances, the decision is attended with sufficient doubt – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused. Held: The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5 Disability Discrimination and Other Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act (2008) (Cth) Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 80 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 21.01 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
Cases cited: Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd and Another v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Equity Access Limited v Westpac Banking Corporation (1989) ATPR 40-972 House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Instyle Contract Textiles Pty Ltd v Good Environmental Choice Services Pty Ltd and Others (2009) 181 FCR 360 Kancheff v Charles Darwin University & Ors [2013] FCCA 1564 Lucas v Yorke & Anor (1983) 58 ALJR 20 Merribee Pastoral v ANZ Banking Group [1998] HCA 41; (1998) 193 CLR 502 Purvis v NSW (Department of Education) (2003) 78 ALJR 1 Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate