Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZSTK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1266 Citation: SZSTK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1266
Appeal from: SZSTK v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 864
Parties: SZSTK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION and BORDER PROTECTION & REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1606 of 2013
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 28 November 2013
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – whether primary judge erred in finding the Refugee Review Tribunal did assess the appellant's complementary protection claims according to law
Cases cited: SZNMJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1345
Date of hearing: 8 November 2013
Place: Sydney
Date of last submissions: 20 November 2013
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms A Crittenden
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1606 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZSTK
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MCKERRACHER J DATE OF ORDER: 28 NOVEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: PERTH (VIA VIDEO-LINK TO SYDNEY)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate