Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Application by Solomons [2013] FCA 1273 Citation: Application by Solomons [2013] FCA 1273
Parties: DAVID SOLOMONS and ANTONY DE VRIES
File number: NSD 2234 of 2013
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 15 November 2013
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – dual appointments – conflict of interest - directions
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2005
Date of hearing: 15 November 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: S Golledge
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Addisons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2234 of 2013
BETWEEN: DAVID SOLOMONS
First Plaintiff
ANTONY DE VRIES
Second Plaintiff
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 15 NOVEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. On the Plaintiff's undertaking, that in the event that any conflict arises that may impede or inhibit the Plaintiffs from acting impartially in the interest of all creditors in the liquidations of Sydney Financial Advisers Pty Ltd and SydFA Pty Ltd and in the bankrupt estate of Gabriel Nakhl or give rise to a reasonable apprehension that the Plaintiffs may be so impeded or inhibited, the Plaintiffs will approach the Court forthwith, the Court gives the following Directions pursuant to Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 511 and Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 30: that the Plaintiffs are justified in remaining as liquidators of SydFA Pty Ltd and Sydney Financial Advisers Pty Ltd (the companies) and as trustees in bankruptcy of Gabriel Nakhl (aka Gabriel Al-Nakhl).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate