Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yao v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 1275 Citation: Yao v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 1275
Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Yao v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 1) [2013] FCA 654
Parties: QING QUAN YAO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
File number: NSD 1917 of 2013
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 28 November 2013
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) s 33(7) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33Z Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.13(a)
Cases cited: Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 applied Reg v Secretary for the Home Department; Ex parte Metha [1975] 1 WLR 1087 applied
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz, Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1917 of 2013
BETWEEN: QING QUAN YAO
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 28 NOVEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate