Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZRIQ v Federal Magistrates Court of Australia [2013] FCA 1284 Citation: SZRIQ v Federal Magistrates Court of Australia [2013] FCA 1284
Parties: SZRIQ v FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA, MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1724 of 2012
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 28 November 2013
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether, in considering whether it was necessary in the interests of the administration of justice that an applicant be granted an extension of time within which to seek judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal pursuant to s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) and thus whether an extension of time should be granted pursuant to s 477 of the Act, the Federal Magistrates Court was obliged to form a view as to whether the applicant had established a sufficiently arguable case as to justify an extension of time or whether the applicant was obliged to prove more – whether, assuming that, in the circumstances of the present case, the Federal Magistrates Court demanded that the applicant prove more than an arguable case, that Court fell into jurisdictional error by doing so – whether, in fact, the Federal Magistrates Court required more than proof of an arguable case – whether the Federal Magistrates Court failed to take into account a relevant consideration or denied procedural fairness to the applicant by not considering whether it should take into account the fact that there was no right of appeal from its decision under s 477(2) of the Act (as to which see s 476A(3)(a) of the Act) or, alternatively, by not actually taking into account that circumstance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate