Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stanford v DePuy International Ltd [2013] FCA 1304 Citation: Stanford v DePuy International Ltd [2013] FCA 1304
Parties: TAMMY MAREE STANFORD and JAMIE DUNSMORE v DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LTD and JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 213 of 2011
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 5 December 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a statutory suppression order – whether order necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AA, 37AE, 37AF, 37AG
Cases cited: Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2009) 177 FCR 205 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651 Regie Nationale des Usines Renault SA v Zhang (2002) 210 CLR 491 Ritz Hotel v Charles of the Ritz (1988) 15 NSWLR 158 Walker v W A Pickles Pty Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 281
Date of hearing: 2 December 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 100
Counsel for the First Applicant: Mr AJL Bannon SC with Mr NM Bender
Solicitor for the First Applicant: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr RA Dick SC with Ms D Bampton
Solicitor for the Respondents: Herbert Smith Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 213 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate