Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chippendale on behalf of the Wuthathi People #2 v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 1401 Citation: Chippendale on behalf of the Wuthathi People #2 v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 1401
Parties: JOHNSON CHIPPENDALE & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WUTHATHI PEOPLE #2 v STATE OF QUEENSLAND AND OTHERS
File number(s): QUD 6022 of 2002
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 5 December 2013
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consideration of an application to remove a respondent party pursuant to s 84 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 84
Cases cited: Chippendale v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 310 - cited
Date of hearing: 5 December 2013
Date of last submissions: 5 December 2013
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr Adam McLean, Cape York Land Council Aboriginal Corporation
Solicitor for the State of Queensland: Ms Bernadette Wrafter, Crown Law
Solicitor for Cook Shire Council: Mr Andrew Kerr, Preston Law
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 6022 of 2002
BETWEEN: JOHNSON CHIPPENDALE & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WUTHATHI PEOPLE #2
Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND AND OTHERS
Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 5 DECEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Isaac Savage be removed as a respondent to the proceeding. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate