Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Australia Bank v Georgoulas [2013] FCA 1412 Citation: National Australia Bank v Georgoulas [2013] FCA 1412 Appeal from: Georgoulas and National Australia Bank Limited [2013] AATA 512 Parties: NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED v MARIA GEORGOULAS
File number: NSD 1683 of 2013
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 20 December 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal on a question of law – scope of jurisdiction conferred by s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether questions of law raised in notice of appeal – where no questions of law raised, no jurisdiction to entertain – requirement to provide reasons WORKERS' COMPENSATION – compensation pursuant to Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) for disease – effect of legislative definitions – disease in the context of mental illness – exclusion of compensation entitlement – whether wilful and false misrepresentation made
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), ss 43(2), 44(1), 45 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth), O 53 r 3(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 33.12 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 430(1)(c) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), ss 4, 5, 5A(1), 5B, 7(7), 14(1), 16,
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (Northern Territory) (2009) 239 CLR 27 Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 38 AAR 55 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Central Aviation Pty Ltd (2009) 179 FCR 554 Comcare v Ethridge (2006) 149 FCR 522 Comcare v Mooi (1996) 69 FCR 439 Comcare Australia v Porter (1996) 70 FCR 139 Commissioner of Taxation v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93 Commissioner of Taxation v Osborne (1990) 26 FCR 63 Commonwealth v Christoffelsz (1988) 18 FCR 415 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1 Victims Compensation Fund Corp v Brown (2003) 77 ALJR 1797
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate