Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 6) [2013] FCA 1414 Citation: Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 6) [2013] FCA 1414
Parties: ALLIANCE CRATON EXPLORER PTY LTD v QUASAR RESOURCES PTY LTD and HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD
File number: VID 551 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2013
Date of hearing: 18 December 2013
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: B Roberts
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth
Counsel for the First Respondent: M Hoffmann QC
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Second Respondent: R Higgins
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 551 of 2010
BETWEEN: ALLIANCE CRATON EXPLORER PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: QUASAR RESOURCES PTY LTD
First Respondent
HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 18 DECEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application of the applicant of 12 December 2013 is refused. 2. The question of costs of the application is reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 551 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate