Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Perera v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1417 Citation: Perera v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1417
Appeal from: Perera v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCCA 1227
Parties: GAYAN DHANAJAYA PERERA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 880 of 2013
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 29 November 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether purported appeal incompetent because leave to appeal is required by s 24(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether judgment of the primary judge to refuse to set aside the interlocutory order of a Registrar final or interlocutory – objection to competency allowed.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001(Cth) rr 13.03(c), 16.05(2)
Cases cited: Perera v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCCA 1227 Re Luck (2003) 203 ALR 1 Dai v Michael Roberts Strata Management Services Ltd [2000] FCA 680 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Limited (No. 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246
Date of hearing: 29 November 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate