Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Workwear Industries Pty Ltd v Pacific Brands Workwear Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1438 Citation: Workwear Industries Pty Ltd v Pacific Brands Workwear Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1438
Parties: WORKWEAR INDUSTRIES PTY LTD (ACN 061 071 065) v PACIFIC BRANDS WORKWEAR GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 004 055 387)
File number(s): WAD 363 of 2012
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 23 December 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – Calderbank offer – the respondent made an offer to the applicant to walk away from the proceeding on the basis that each party bear its own costs – whether the applicant unreasonably refused the respondent's offer.
Cases cited: Workwear Industries Pty Ltd v Pacific Brands Workwear Group Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1042 Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers.
Date of last submissions: 13 November 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 38
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Karp
Solicitor for the Applicant: Karp Steedman Ross-Adjie Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr E Heerey
Solicitor for the Respondent: Wrays Lawyers Pty Ltd
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 363 of 2012
BETWEEN: WORKWEAR INDUSTRIES PTY LTD (ACN 061 071 065)
Applicant
AND: PACIFIC BRANDS WORKWEAR GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 004 055 387)
Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 23 december 2013 WHERE MADE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate